We have the tools. No one's using them. Now what?
The problem is not the tools; it is that deploying a tool is not the same as adopting it. Adoption is a people problem, and you fix it people-first, not by buying more software.
Stop shopping. The instinct, when a tool sits unused, is to wonder whether you bought the wrong one. Almost always, you did not. Deploying a tool and adopting it are different acts, and the gap between them is not technical. It is human.
Adoption is a behavior change, and behavior change is slow, social, and personal. A license does not change how a scientist with a decade of method decides to work. A respected peer does, once they show it is safe and worth it. So the fix is not more software. It is to lead the human change you skipped.
Concretely: find one respected person and solve one real, small problem with them; turn that convert into an ambassador; teach in person, in small doses; make responsible experimentation safe; and measure adoption, not deployment. That sequence is The People-First Playbook, and it is the whole job. The longer argument is People First, or Not at All, and the worked example is Avidity, where a policy became behavior fifteen minutes at a time.
If your tools are unused, you do not have a tool problem. You have a people problem wearing a tool problem’s costume, and no purchase order will fix it.
Cheers,
-Titus
Get it in your inbox.
New Issues, FAQs, and Case Studies as they go out. Each one names something, explains something, or hands you something you can use on Monday. Subscribe, and I will send each as it goes out.
Prefer the tool you already think in? Here is how to read it in your chatbot.